February 11th, 2008
Copyright is such a complicated thing. And no one in romanceland seems to be discussing this case, but I find it fascinating. Does Rowling “own” her characters because she created them? How far exactly does that fact take her rights? Would this case be seen differently if she had fought the web site as soon as she learned of it instead of waiting until she found out they wanted to put everything in book form and sell it?
To hear the NY Times take, go here…
